Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Union

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Union COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (12.0%), Union has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Union has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Chlamydia Cases

Current Value:

County: Union Chlamydia Cases

2,252
Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (2,252) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2,252).
Prior Value
(2,252)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Gonorrhea Cases

Current Value:

County: Union Gonorrhea Cases

608
Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (608) is less and better than the previously measured value (627).
Prior Value
(627)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union HIV Prevalence Rate

Current Value:

County: Union HIV Prevalence Rate

584.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (448.5), Union has a value of 584.8.
NJ Value
(448.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (382.2), Union has a value of 584.8.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (584.8) is greater  than the previously measured value (548.9).
Prior Value
(548.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Syphilis Cases

Current Value:

County: Union Syphilis Cases

64
Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (64) is less and better than the previously measured value (97).
Prior Value
(97)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Adults who Currently Use Smokeless Tobacco

Current Value:
1.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 1.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 20 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (1.7%), Union has a value of 1.3% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (1.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.1%).
Prior Value
(1.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Union Adults who Smoke

12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Union has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Union

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Union Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

27.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 27.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (27.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.1%).
Prior Value
(27.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (23.8%), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(23.8%)
<div><span>The percentage of obese adults is an indicator of the overall health and lifestyle of a community. Obesity increases the risk of many diseases and health conditions including heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, cancer, hypertension, stroke, liver and gallbladder disease, respiratory problems, and osteoarthritis. Losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight help to prevent and control these diseases. Being obese also carries significant economic costs due to increased healthcare spending and lost earnings.</span></div>

County: Union

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:
11.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 11.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.1%), Union has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Union has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Union Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Union Insufficient Sleep

36.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 36.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 36.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (32.3%), Union has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(32.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Union has a value of 36.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (36.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (39.2%).
Prior Value
(39.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Union Limited Activity due to a Health Problem

Current Value:
13.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (16.1%), Union has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Union has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Union Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
3.4
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 3.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 3.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (3.2), Union has a value of 3.4 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(3.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Union has a value of 3.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (3.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.7).
Prior Value
(2.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Union has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Union

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Civic Engagement Ranking

Current Value:

County: Union Civic Engagement Ranking

15.0
(2010)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 15.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the prior value, Union (15.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.0).
Prior Value
(17.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
69%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 69% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (72%), Union has a value of 69% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(72%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (69%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69%).
Prior Value
(69%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Union

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
3.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 3.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (3.8), Union has a value of 3.4 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Union has a value of 3.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (3.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.1).
Prior Value
(3.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Union Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Union Violent Crime Rate

253.3
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 253.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 143.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 321.4.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the US Value (398.5), Union has a value of 253.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(398.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Federal Bureau of Investigation
Compared to the prior value, Union (253.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (281.9).
Prior Value
(281.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Union Average Household Size

2.80
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (2.60), Union has a value of 2.80.
NJ Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Union has a value of 2.80.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Female Population

Current Value:

County: Union Female Population

50.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (50.7%), Union has a value of 50.5%.
NJ Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Union has a value of 50.5%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (50.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (50.6%).
Prior Value
(50.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Union Foreign Born Persons

31.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (23.2%), Union has a value of 31.6%.
NJ Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Union has a value of 31.6%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Households

Current Value:

County: Union Households

199,996
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Male Population

Current Value:

County: Union Male Population

49.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (49.3%), Union has a value of 49.5%.
NJ Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Union has a value of 49.5%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (49.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (49.4%).
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

45.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (32.2%), Union has a value of 45.6%.
NJ Value
(32.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Union has a value of 45.6%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
1.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (0.7%), Union has a value of 1.0%.
NJ Value
(0.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Union has a value of 1.0%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (1.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (0.9%).
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Union Population Asian

6.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (10.5%), Union has a value of 6.2%.
NJ Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Union has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (6.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Black or African American

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (15.4%), Union has a value of 24.0%.
NJ Value
(15.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Union has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (24.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (23.9%).
Prior Value
(23.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (21.9%), Union has a value of 34.0%.
NJ Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Union has a value of 34.0%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (34.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (33.6%).
Prior Value
(33.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (0.1%), Union has a value of 0.1%.
NJ Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Union has a value of 0.1%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (0.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Union Population Over Age 65

15.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (17.4%), Union has a value of 15.3%.
NJ Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Union has a value of 15.3%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (15.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
83,680
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Two or More Races

Current Value:
2.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (2.4%), Union has a value of 2.3%.
NJ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Union has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (2.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Union Population Under Age 18

23.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (21.5%), Union has a value of 23.2%.
NJ Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Union has a value of 23.2%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (23.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.2%).
Prior Value
(23.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Union Population Under Age 5

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (5.6%), Union has a value of 6.0%.
NJ Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Union has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (6.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (6.1%).
Prior Value
(6.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population White

Current Value:

County: Union Population White

66.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (70.7%), Union has a value of 66.3%.
NJ Value
(70.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Union has a value of 66.3%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (66.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (66.7%).
Prior Value
(66.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
37.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (52.9%), Union has a value of 37.6%.
NJ Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Union has a value of 37.6%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (37.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Total Population

Current Value:

County: Union Total Population

572,726
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (572,726) is greater  than the previously measured value (570,417).
Prior Value
(570,417)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Union Veteran Population

2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (4.1%), Union has a value of 2.9%.
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Union has a value of 2.9%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Within County Disparity in Life Expectancy at Birth

6.5
Disparity (In Years)
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (6.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions

5.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 5.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 20 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (6.8), Union has a value of 5.5 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(6.8)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (5.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2).
Prior Value
(6.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
20.3%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 20.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 20.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (22.9%), Union has a value of 20.3% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(22.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Union has a value of 20.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (20.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
23.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 23.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 23.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (21.5%), Union has a value of 23.2% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(21.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Union has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Union Linguistic Isolation

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 12.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 12.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (6.9%), Union has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Union has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Union People 65+ Living Alone

25.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 25.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 25.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (26.2%), Union has a value of 25.6% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Union has a value of 25.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
21,431
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Union Social Associations

8.1
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 8.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.5.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 8.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (8.1), Union has a value of 8.1.
NJ Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Union has a value of 8.1 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (8.1) is less and worse than the previously measured value (8.5).
Prior Value
(8.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:
1.8
Cases per 1,000 children
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 1.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (2.5), Union has a value of 1.8 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(2.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.2), Union has a value of 1.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Children's Bureau
Compared to the prior value, Union (1.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)

County: Union

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Union Mean Travel Time to Work

30.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 30.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 30.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.1), Union has a value of 30.6 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(31.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Union has a value of 30.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
41.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 41.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 41.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (43.0%), Union has a value of 41.7% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Union has a value of 41.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (41.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.1%).
Prior Value
(42.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.0%), Union has a value of 9.4% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Union has a value of 9.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Union Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
63.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 63.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 70.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 77.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 63.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (65.4%), Union has a value of 63.9% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(65.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Union has a value of 63.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Economy

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Cost of Family Child Care as a Percentage of Income

9.8%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 9.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.1%), Union has a value of 9.8% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.

County: Union Cost of Licensed Child Care as a Percentage of Income

13.4%
(2013)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.2%), Union has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.

County: Union

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Union Employer Establishments

13,996
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (13,996) is greater  than the previously measured value (13,934).
Prior Value
(13,934)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
63.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 63.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (60.9%), Union has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(60.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Union has a value of 63.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
64.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 64.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 64.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (61.8%), Union has a value of 64.5% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(61.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Union has a value of 64.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Union Size of Labor Force

292,934
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (292,934) is less and worse than the previously measured value (295,427).
Prior Value
(295,427)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Union Total Employment

187,879
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (187,879) is less  than the previously measured value (205,090).
Prior Value
(205,090)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Union Total Employment Change

-8.4%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of -8.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -6.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -8.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of -8.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (-6.5%), Union has a value of -8.4% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(-6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Union has a value of -8.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (-8.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.2%).
Prior Value
(0.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
5.4%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 5.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 5.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (5.2%), Union has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Union has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (5.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
8.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.8%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (8.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

13%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 13% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
NJ Counties
(2020)
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 13% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (19%), Union has a value of 13% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(19%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Union has a value of 13% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (13%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21%).
Prior Value
(21%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Union Food Insecurity Rate

6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (8.8%), Union has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Union has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (6.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.3%).
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (47.2%), Union has a value of 47.1%.
NJ Value
(47.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Union has a value of 47.1%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

7,587
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
16.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 16.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (15.3%), Union has a value of 16.1% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (16.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.4%).
Prior Value
(18.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
11.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.7%), Union has a value of 11.2% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (11.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
38.1%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 38.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 38.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (30.5%), Union has a value of 38.1% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(30.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Union has a value of 38.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (38.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (34.6%).
Prior Value
(34.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 2.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (2.2%), Union has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Union has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Homelessness by County

Current Value:

County: Union Homelessness by County

5.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (0.11%), Union has a value of 5.6% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(0.11% in 2014)
Compared to the prior value, Union (5.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Union Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (1.0%), Union has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Union has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Union Homeownership

54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 54.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 54.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (58.5%), Union has a value of 54.9% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Union has a value of 54.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Union Housing Units

211,919
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (211,919) is greater  than the previously measured value (211,046).
Prior Value
(211,046)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$1,570
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $1,570 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,501 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,703.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($1,577), Union has a value of $1,570 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
($1,577)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Union has a value of $1,570 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:
$458,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $458,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $372,300 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $283,750.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($401,400), Union has a value of $458,000 which is higher and better.
NJ Value
($401,400)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Union has a value of $458,000 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$1,390
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $1,390 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,085 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,327.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($1,175), Union has a value of $1,390 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
($1,175)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Union has a value of $1,390 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

$3,053
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $3,053 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,519 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $3,058.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value ($2,728), Union has a value of $3,053 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
($2,728)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Union has a value of $3,053 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

31.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 31.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 31.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.5%), Union has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(31.5%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Union has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (31.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.4%).
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Union Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Union Overcrowded Households

5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 5.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (3.6%), Union has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Union has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

51.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 51.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 51.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 56.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 51.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (50.7%), Union has a value of 51.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Union has a value of 51.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Union Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Union Severe Housing Problems

21.8%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 21.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 21.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (19.8%), Union has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(19.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Union has a value of 21.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (21.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

59.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 59.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (63.0%), Union has a value of 59.1% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (59.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (65.0%).
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

31.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 31.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (26.0%), Union has a value of 31.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (31.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.4%).
Prior Value
(26.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Union Income Inequality

0.487
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 0.487 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.464 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.483.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 0.487 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (0.481), Union has a value of 0.487 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(0.481)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Union has a value of 0.487 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Union Median Household Income

$95,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $95,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $92,697 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $82,192.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of $95,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value ($97,126), Union has a value of $95,000 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($97,126)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Union has a value of $95,000 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Median Household Income By Age - 25-44

Current Value:
$73,610.0
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value ($81,674), Union has a value of $73,610.0 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($81,674)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey value.

County: Union Median Household Income By Age - 45-64

Current Value:
$84,822.0
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value ($87,785), Union has a value of $84,822.0 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($87,785)

County: Union Median Household Income By Age - 65+

Current Value:
$42,644.0
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value ($42,460), Union has a value of $42,644.0 which is higher and better.
NJ Value
($42,460)

County: Union Median Household Income By Age - Under 25

Current Value:
$38,686.0
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value ($32,696), Union has a value of $38,686.0 which is higher and better.
NJ Value
($32,696)

County: Union Median Income Per Individual Worker

Current Value:
$35,638.0
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value ($30,540), Union has a value of $35,638.0 which is higher and better.
NJ Value
($30,540)

County: Union Median Individual Worker Income - Female

Current Value:
$30,654.0
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value ($32,097), Union has a value of $30,654.0 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($32,097)

County: Union Median Individual Worker Income - Male

Current Value:
$41,672.0
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value ($47,414), Union has a value of $41,672.0 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($47,414)

County: Union Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Union Per Capita Income

$49,666
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of $49,666 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $49,666 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $42,448.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of $49,666 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value ($50,995), Union has a value of $49,666 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($50,995)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Union has a value of $49,666 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 11.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (13.3%), Union has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Union has a value of 11.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Children Under 5 Years Old Living in Poverty

Current Value:
17.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (18.0%), Union has a value of 17.3% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (17.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (6.9%), Union has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Union has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 9.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.0%), Union has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (9.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.6%).
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
8.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 8.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.1%), Union has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Union has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
7,132
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
76.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 76.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 76.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (78.2%), Union has a value of 76.6% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Union has a value of 76.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 8.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.7%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Union has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Union Utility Assistance for Low-Income Households

Current Value:
9,115.0
Per 100,000 Households
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (9,280), Union has a value of 9,115.0.
NJ Value
(9,280)
The regional value is compared to the NJ State value.

County: Union Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (14.3%), Union has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Union has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 2.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 2.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (1.4%), Union has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Union has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Union Child Care Centers

7.6
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 7.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (8.2), Union has a value of 7.6 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(8.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Union has a value of 7.6 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (7.6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (7.9).
Prior Value
(7.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
38.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 38.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (42.3%), Union has a value of 38.3% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Union has a value of 38.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

86.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 86.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 86.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (90.6%), Union has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Union has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Union Student-to-Teacher Ratio

12.5
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 12.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.8), Union has a value of 12.5 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Union has a value of 12.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (12.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.3).
Prior Value
(12.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:
2
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Union has a value of 2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Union (2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
16,802
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (16,802) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16,262).
Prior Value
(16,262)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
100.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 100.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (96.3%), Union has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(96.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Union has a value of 100.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (100.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (99.8%).
Prior Value
(99.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Union Access to Parks

93.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 93.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (91.4%), Union has a value of 93.7% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(91.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (93.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (83.7%).
Prior Value
(83.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Children with Low Access to a Grocery Store

Current Value:
2.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 2.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.1%).
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Farmers Market Density

Current Value:

County: Union Farmers Market Density

0.01
Markets per 1,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.03), Union has a value of 0.01 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(0.03 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the median value of 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (0.01) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.01).
Prior Value
(0.01)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Fast Food Restaurant Density

Current Value:
0.68
Restaurants per 1,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 0.68 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.75 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.80.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 0.68 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.59 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.75.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (0.68) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.66).
Prior Value
(0.66)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Union Food Environment Index

9.4
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 8.4.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.0), Union has a value of 9.4 which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(9.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Union has a value of 9.4 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (9.4) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Grocery Store Density

Current Value:

County: Union Grocery Store Density

0.27
Stores per 1,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 0.27 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.25 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.19.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 0.27 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.19 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.13.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (0.27) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.29).
Prior Value
(0.29)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Households with No Car and Low Access to a Grocery Store

0.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 0.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (0.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.6%).
Prior Value
(0.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Union Liquor Store Density

20.3
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 20.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 20.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (19.5), Union has a value of 20.3 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(19.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Union has a value of 20.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (20.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.0).
Prior Value
(20.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Low-Income and Low Access to a Grocery Store

Current Value:
1.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (1.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.3%).
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union People 65+ with Low Access to a Grocery Store

Current Value:
1.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (1.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.9%).
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Union Proximity to Highways

9.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 9.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (8.0%), Union has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union Recreation and Fitness Facilities

Current Value:
0.17
Facilities per 1,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.06), Union has a value of 0.17 which is higher and better.
US Value
(0.06 in 2014)
The regional value is compared to the median value of 3,143 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Union (0.17) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.17).
Prior Value
(0.17)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union WIC Certified Stores

Current Value:

County: Union WIC Certified Stores

0.1
Stores per 1,000 population
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 0.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union has a value of 0.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,981 U.S. counties and county equivalents.

County: Union

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Blood Lead Levels in Children (>=5 micrograms per deciliter)

1.7%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 1.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
NJ Counties
(2015)
The distribution is based on data from 20 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (2.2%), Union has a value of 1.7% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (1.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union PBT Released

Current Value:

County: Union PBT Released

23,028
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (23,028) is less and better than the previously measured value (23,503).
Prior Value
(23,503)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Risk factor for childhood lead exposure: Pre-1950 Housing

37.4%
% Housing units built pre-1950
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (26.0%), Union has a value of 37.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the percent of pre-1950 housing units out of all resident housing in the state.
Compared to the prior value, Union (37.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.9%).
Prior Value
(38.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Union

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Union

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Union Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:
3,134.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Union has a value of 3,134.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3,252.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,393.0.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (3,264.0), Union has a value of 3,134.0 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(3,264.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Union (3,134.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,275.0).
Prior Value
(3,275.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Months of Mild Drought or Worse

Current Value:
7
Months per year
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7).
Prior Value
(7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:
18
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (18) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18).
Prior Value
(18)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:
15
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (15) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12).
Prior Value
(12)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
22
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (22) is less and better than the previously measured value (24).
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Union Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.