Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Warren

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Rate of Substance Use Emergency Department Visits

20.4
Age-Adjusted Rate per 10,000 population
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (25.56), Warren has a value of 20.4 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(25.56)
The regional value is compared to the average rate for New Jersey Counties.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (20.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.4).
Prior Value
(24.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
155.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 155.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 142.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 160.6.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 155.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (141.0), Warren has a value of 155.6 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(141.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Warren has a value of 155.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (155.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (159.9).
Prior Value
(159.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (161.5), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(161.5)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
37.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 37.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 37.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (30.2), Warren has a value of 37.6 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(30.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Warren has a value of 37.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (37.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.7).
Prior Value
(38.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (42.0), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(42.0)
<div><span>According to the American Lung Association, more people die from lung cancer annually than any other type of cancer, exceeding the total deaths caused by breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer combined. The greatest risk factor for lung cancer is duration and quantity of smoking. While the mortality rate due to lung cancer among men has reached a plateau, the mortality rate due to lung cancer among women continues to increase.</span></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Pancreatic Cancer

Current Value:
12.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 12.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 12.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,864 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.3), Warren has a value of 12.5 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.1), Warren has a value of 12.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (12.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.8).
Prior Value
(12.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Warren All Cancer Incidence Rate

507.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 507.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 491.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 518.5.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 507.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (481.9), Warren has a value of 507.5 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(481.9)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Warren has a value of 507.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (507.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (508.6).
Prior Value
(508.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
132.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 132.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 135.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 144.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 132.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (137.1), Warren has a value of 132.3 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(137.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Warren has a value of 132.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (132.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (132.7).
Prior Value
(132.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (13.0%), Warren has a value of 13.0%.
NJ Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Warren has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
42.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 42.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.0.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 42.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (38.7), Warren has a value of 42.5 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(38.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Warren has a value of 42.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (42.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.7).
Prior Value
(43.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (39.7), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(39.7)
<div><span>Colorectal cancer--cancer of the colon or rectum--is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. If adults aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60% of the deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented. In the U.S. in 2009, it is estimated that there were 106,100 new cases and 49,920 deaths from colorectal cancer.</span></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 6.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 6.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (8.0), Warren has a value of 6.9 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(8.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Warren has a value of 6.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (6.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2).
Prior Value
(6.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
63.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 63.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 65.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 63.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (51.3), Warren has a value of 63.9 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(51.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Warren has a value of 63.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (63.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (64.2).
Prior Value
(64.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
42.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 42.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 42.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (45.0%), Warren has a value of 42.0% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Warren has a value of 42.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (42.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.0%).
Prior Value
(40.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Warren Melanoma Incidence Rate

25.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 25.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.4.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 25.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (21.0), Warren has a value of 25.7 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(21.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5), Warren has a value of 25.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (25.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.6).
Prior Value
(26.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
23.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 23.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 23.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (21.3), Warren has a value of 23.3 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(21.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6), Warren has a value of 23.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (23.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.5).
Prior Value
(23.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
12.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 12.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 12.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.4), Warren has a value of 12.3 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Warren has a value of 12.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (12.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.5).
Prior Value
(12.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
120.0
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 120.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 142.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 155.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 120.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (143.3), Warren has a value of 120.0 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(143.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Warren has a value of 120.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (120.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (121.6).
Prior Value
(121.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Warren Adults 20+ with Diabetes

9.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Adults with Prediabetes

Current Value:

County: Warren Adults with Prediabetes

8.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.7%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.4%), Warren has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
18.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 18.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (18.5), Warren has a value of 18.2 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Warren has a value of 18.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (18.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.6).
Prior Value
(17.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (15.8), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(15.8)
<div><span>Diabetes is a group of diseases marked by high levels of blood glucose, also called blood sugar, resulting from defects in insulin production, insulin action, or both. In 2007, diabetes was the seventh leading cause of death in the United States and an estimated 23.6 million people or 7.8% of the population had diabetes. The prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes increased sixfold in the latter half of the last century. Diabetes risk factors such as obesity and physical inactivity have played a major role in this dramatic increase. Age, race, and ethnicity are also important risk factors. </span><br /><br /><span>Diabetes can have a harmful effect on most of the organ systems in the human body; it is a frequent cause of end-stage renal disease, non-traumatic lower-extremity amputation, and a leading cause of blindness among working age adults. Persons with diabetes are also at increased risk for ischemic heart disease, neuropathy, and stroke. In economic terms, the direct medical expenditure attributable to diabetes in 2007 was estimated to be $116 billion.</span></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (28.0%), Warren has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Warren has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Children with a Disability

Current Value:
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (3.6%), Warren has a value of 3.5%.
NJ Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Warren has a value of 3.5%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (4.1%), Warren has a value of 4.9%.
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Warren has a value of 4.9%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Warren Persons with a Disability

11.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (10.6%), Warren has a value of 11.8%.
NJ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Warren has a value of 11.8%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (2.6%), Warren has a value of 3.8%.
NJ Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Warren has a value of 3.8%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (2.4%), Warren has a value of 1.9%.
NJ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Warren has a value of 1.9%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (2.0%), Warren has a value of 1.7%.
NJ Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Warren has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (5.7%), Warren has a value of 5.8%.
NJ Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Warren has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor

Current Value:
10.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 10.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.7%), Warren has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.7%), Warren has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Warren (10.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:
95.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 95.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 95.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (90.4%), Warren has a value of 95.3% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Warren has a value of 95.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (95.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.2%).
Prior Value
(93.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:
97.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 97.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 97.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 95.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 97.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (96.1%), Warren has a value of 97.9% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(96.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Warren has a value of 97.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (97.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.1%).
Prior Value
(93.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
93.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 93.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 93.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (91.7%), Warren has a value of 93.1% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (93.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.0%).
Prior Value
(92.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
67.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (59.6%), Warren has a value of 67.1%.
NJ Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Warren has a value of 67.1%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (67.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (60.6%).
Prior Value
(60.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
14.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (21.9%), Warren has a value of 14.6%.
NJ Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Warren has a value of 14.6%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (14.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (18.5%).
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
3,711.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 3,711.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,977.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,596.5.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 3,711.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (2,986.0), Warren has a value of 3,711.0 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(2,986.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Warren has a value of 3,711.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (3,711.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,388.0).
Prior Value
(3,388.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
92.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 92.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 92.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (92.8%), Warren has a value of 92.9% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Warren has a value of 92.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults who Experienced a Heart Attack

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 20 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (3.0%), Warren has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (2.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

27.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 27.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.1.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.6), Warren has a value of 27.8 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(31.6)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Warren has a value of 27.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (27.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.5).
Prior Value
(25.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (28.6), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(28.6)
<div><span>Cerebrovascular diseases rank third among the leading causes of death in the U.S. Cerebrovascular disease can cause a stroke. A stroke occurs when blood vessels carrying oxygen to the brain become blocked or burst, thereby cutting off the brain's supply of oxygen. Lack of oxygen causes brain cells to die which can lead to death or disability. Each year, approximately 795,000 people in the U.S. will suffer a new or recurrent stroke. Although people of all ages may have strokes, the risk more than doubles with each decade of life after age 55. The most important modifiable risk factors for stroke are high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes mellitus.</span></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
40.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 40.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.5.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (45.4), Warren has a value of 40.5 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(45.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (40.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.0).
Prior Value
(39.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
177.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 177.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 191.3.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (161.4), Warren has a value of 177.2 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(161.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (177.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (174.6).
Prior Value
(174.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (112.1), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(112.1)
<div> <div>Heart disease is a term that encompasses a variety of different diseases affecting the heart and is the leading cause of death in the United States accounting for 25.4% of total deaths. The most common type in the United States is coronary artery disease, which can cause heart attack, angina, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Coronary artery disease occurs when plaque builds up in the arteries that supply blood to the heart and the arteries narrow (atherosclerosis). There are many modifiable risk factors for atherosclerosis including tobacco smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and high levels of low-density lipoprotein in blood serum. Moreover, it is important to note that heart disease is the number one killer of women in the United States.</div> <div> </div> </div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

20.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 20.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.6.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (23.5), Warren has a value of 20.8 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(23.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (20.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.4).
Prior Value
(19.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (15.0%), Warren has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Warren has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (12.0%), Warren has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Warren has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
71.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 71.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 71.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (73.0%), Warren has a value of 71.0% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(73.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Warren has a value of 71.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (71.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (70.0%).
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
70.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 70.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 70.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (69.0%), Warren has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Warren has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (70.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (69.0%).
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (25.0%), Warren has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Warren has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (7.0%), Warren has a value of 7.0%.
NJ Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Warren has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

12.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 12.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.3.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (11.7), Warren has a value of 12.7 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Warren has a value of 12.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (12.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0).
Prior Value
(15.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 52.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (55.0%), Warren has a value of 52.0% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Warren has a value of 52.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (52.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (53.0%).
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
71.5%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 71.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 71.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (71.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.5%).
Prior Value
(71.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (8.0%), Warren has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Warren has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (9.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:
7.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 7.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (7.7%), Warren has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Warren has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (7.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (7.7%), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(7.7%)
<div><span>Babies born with a low birth weight are more likely than babies of normal weight to require specialized medical care, and often must stay in the intensive care unit. Low birth weight is often associated with premature birth. While there have been many medical advances enabling premature infants to survive, there is still risk of infant death or long-term disability. The most important things an expectant mother can do to prevent prematurity and low birth weight are to take prenatal vitamins, stop smoking, stop drinking alcohol and using drugs, and most importantly, get prenatal care.</span></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
83.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 83.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (74.9%), Warren has a value of 83.6% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Warren has a value of 83.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (83.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.5%).
Prior Value
(81.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (79.4%), the target has  been met.
NJ 2020
(79.4%)
<div><span><span>Babies born to mothers who do not receive prenatal care are three times more likely to have a low birth weight and five times more likely to die than those born to mothers who do get care. Early prenatal care (i.e. care in the first trimester of a pregnancy) allows women and their health care providers to identify and, when possible, treat or correct health problems and health-compromising behaviors that can be particularly damaging during the initial stages of fetal development. Increasing the number of women who receive prenatal care, and who do so early in their pregnancies, can improve birth outcomes and lower health care costs by reducing the likelihood of complications during pregnancy and childbirth.</span></span></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Warren Preterm Births

10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 10.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.2%), Warren has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Warren has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (10.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 17.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (15.0%), Warren has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Warren has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate

756.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 756.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 761.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 863.4.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (742.0), Warren has a value of 756.2 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(742.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (756.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (732.1).
Prior Value
(732.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Warren Life Expectancy

78.9
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 78.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.9.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 78.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (79.2), Warren has a value of 78.9 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Warren has a value of 78.9 which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
29.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (30.0%), Warren has a value of 29.7%.
NJ Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Warren has a value of 29.7%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (10.9%), Warren has a value of 13.5%.
NJ Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Warren has a value of 13.5%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (7.4%), Warren has a value of 4.6%.
NJ Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Warren has a value of 4.6%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (5.2%), Warren has a value of 4.0%.
NJ Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Warren has a value of 4.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
10.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (13.3%), Warren has a value of 10.2%.
NJ Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Warren has a value of 10.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (6.0%), Warren has a value of 6.0%.
NJ Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Warren has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Warren Adults with Arthritis

16.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.7%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (20.1%), Warren has a value of 16.2% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (16.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (16.0%), Warren has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Warren has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (22.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (12.0%), Warren has a value of 12.0%.
NJ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Warren has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (12.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 36.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 36.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (37.0%), Warren has a value of 36.0% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Warren has a value of 36.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (36.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
20.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 20.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.7%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 20.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (20.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.6%).
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Adults Engaging in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
53.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 53.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (49.2%), Warren has a value of 53.7% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (20.3%), Warren has a value of 53.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Warren (53.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.7%).
Prior Value
(47.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (29.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(29.7%)
<div>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

54.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 54.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 78.2.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (50.1), Warren has a value of 54.0 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(50.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Warren has a value of 54.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (54.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (53.6).
Prior Value
(53.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings

30.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 30.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 52.4.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.5), Warren has a value of 30.4 which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(31.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.3), Warren has a value of 30.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(28.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (30.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.9).
Prior Value
(32.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the NJ 2020 (6.8), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(6.8)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

26.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 26.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.6.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (24.2), Warren has a value of 26.2 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(24.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4), Warren has a value of 26.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Warren (26.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.0).
Prior Value
(30.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (7.0%), Warren has a value of 7.0%.
NJ Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Warren has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (7.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Warren COPD: Medicare Population

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (12.0%), Warren has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Warren has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Chlamydia Cases

Current Value:

County: Warren Chlamydia Cases

243
Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Warren (243) is less and better than the previously measured value (274).
Prior Value
(274)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Gonorrhea Cases

Current Value:

County: Warren Gonorrhea Cases

58
Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Warren (58) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (51).
Prior Value
(51)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Syphilis Cases

Current Value:

County: Warren Syphilis Cases

1
Cases
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Warren (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Warren Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

31.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 31.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 31.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (31.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
Compared to the NJ 2020 (23.8%), the target has not been met.
NJ 2020
(23.8%)
<div><span>The percentage of obese adults is an indicator of the overall health and lifestyle of a community. Obesity increases the risk of many diseases and health conditions including heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, cancer, hypertension, stroke, liver and gallbladder disease, respiratory problems, and osteoarthritis. Losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight help to prevent and control these diseases. Being obese also carries significant economic costs due to increased healthcare spending and lost earnings.</span></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Limited Activity due to a Health Problem

Current Value:
18.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (16.1%), Warren has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Warren Foreign Born Persons

9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (23.2%), Warren has a value of 9.9%.
NJ Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Warren has a value of 9.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Total Population

Current Value:

County: Warren Total Population

110,926
People
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Warren (110,926) is greater  than the previously measured value (110,494).
Prior Value
(110,494)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Warren Veteran Population

6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NJ Value (4.1%), Warren has a value of 6.2%.
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Warren has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Warren Mean Travel Time to Work

34.0
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 34.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.7.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 34.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (31.1), Warren has a value of 34.0 which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(31.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Warren has a value of 34.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 1.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.4%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 1.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.0%), Warren has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Warren has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
77.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 77.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 70.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 77.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 77.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (65.4%), Warren has a value of 77.7% which is higher and worse.
NJ Value
(65.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Warren has a value of 77.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Warren Overcrowded Households

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (3.6%), Warren has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Warren has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

48.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 48.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 51.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 56.9%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 48.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (50.7%), Warren has a value of 48.1% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Warren has a value of 48.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Warren Median Household Income

$92,620
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of $92,620 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $92,697 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $82,192.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of $92,620 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value ($97,126), Warren has a value of $92,620 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($97,126)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Warren has a value of $92,620 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Warren Per Capita Income

$45,517
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of $45,517 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $49,666 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $42,448.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of $45,517 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value ($50,995), Warren has a value of $45,517 which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
($50,995)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Warren has a value of $45,517 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 9.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (13.3%), Warren has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Warren has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 5.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 5.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (6.9%), Warren has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Warren has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.1%), Warren has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Warren has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
1,441
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (9.7%), Warren has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Warren has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (14.3%), Warren has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Warren has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (1.4%), Warren has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
NJ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Warren has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
35.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 35.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.6%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 35.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (42.3%), Warren has a value of 35.5% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Warren has a value of 35.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
93.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 93.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.8%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Warren has a value of 93.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NJ Value (90.6%), Warren has a value of 93.8% which is higher and better.
NJ Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Warren has a value of 93.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Warren value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Warren

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Warren Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Warren Access to Parks

83.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NJ Counties, Warren has a value of 83.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.5%.
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
Compared to the NJ Value (91.4%), Warren has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
NJ Value
(91.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Compared to the prior value, Warren (83.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV