Search for Indicators
Disparities Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
County: Sussex
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults who Binge Drink
County: Sussex Adults who Binge Drink
26.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(15.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults who Use Alcohol: Past 30 Days
County: Sussex Adults who Use Alcohol: Past 30 Days
66.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(56.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(68.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
39.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(32.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
23.2
Age-Adjusted Rate per 10,000 population
(2014)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(25.56)
The regional value is compared to the average rate for New Jersey Counties.
Prior Value
(27.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sussex Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Sussex Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
32.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(32.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sussex
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
155.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(141.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(161.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
NJ 2020
(161.5)
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
35.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(30.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
NJ 2020
(42.0)
<div><span>According to the American Lung Association, more people die from lung cancer annually than any other type of cancer, exceeding the total deaths caused by breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer combined. The greatest risk factor for lung cancer is duration and quantity of smoking. While the mortality rate due to lung cancer among men has reached a plateau, the mortality rate due to lung cancer among women continues to increase.</span></div>
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Pancreatic Cancer
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Pancreatic Cancer
13.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,864 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sussex All Cancer Incidence Rate
512.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(481.9)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(506.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
141.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(137.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(139.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Cancer: Medicare Population
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
43.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(38.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(42.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
NJ 2020
(39.7)
<div><span>Colorectal cancer--cancer of the colon or rectum--is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. If adults aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60% of the deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented. In the U.S. in 2009, it is estimated that there were 106,100 new cases and 49,920 deaths from colorectal cancer.</span></div>
County: Sussex Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate
7.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,355 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(8.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
57.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(51.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(59.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
42.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Melanoma Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Melanoma Incidence Rate
28.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,961 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(21.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(22.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate
23.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,912 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(21.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
14.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sussex Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
124.7
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(143.3)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(122.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Sussex Adults 20+ with Diabetes
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults with Prediabetes
County: Sussex Adults with Prediabetes
10.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(9.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
22.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(22.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
NJ 2020
(15.8)
<div><span>Diabetes is a group of diseases marked by high levels of blood glucose, also called blood sugar, resulting from defects in insulin production, insulin action, or both. In 2007, diabetes was the seventh leading cause of death in the United States and an estimated 23.6 million people or 7.8% of the population had diabetes. The prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes increased sixfold in the latter half of the last century. Diabetes risk factors such as obesity and physical inactivity have played a major role in this dramatic increase. Age, race, and ethnicity are also important risk factors. </span><br /><br /><span>Diabetes can have a harmful effect on most of the organ systems in the human body; it is a frequent cause of end-stage renal disease, non-traumatic lower-extremity amputation, and a leading cause of blindness among working age adults. Persons with diabetes are also at increased risk for ischemic heart disease, neuropathy, and stroke. In economic terms, the direct medical expenditure attributable to diabetes in 2007 was estimated to be $116 billion.</span></div>
County: Sussex Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Diabetes: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Children with a Disability
County: Sussex Children with a Disability
4.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Sussex Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with a Disability
County: Sussex Persons with a Disability
11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Sussex Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Sussex Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Sussex Persons with a Vision Difficulty
1.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Sussex Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
County: Sussex Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor
9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(12.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Sussex Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
80.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(74.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(80.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults with Health Insurance
County: Sussex Adults with Health Insurance
95.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(93.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Children with Health Insurance
County: Sussex Children with Health Insurance
96.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(96.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with Health Insurance
County: Sussex Persons with Health Insurance
94.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(94.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sussex Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Sussex Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
67.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(65.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Sussex Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
15.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,767.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(2,986.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,804.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Sussex Persons with an Internet Subscription
95.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Sussex Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
30.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(31.6)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(29.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
NJ 2020
(28.6)
<div><span>Cerebrovascular diseases rank third among the leading causes of death in the U.S. Cerebrovascular disease can cause a stroke. A stroke occurs when blood vessels carrying oxygen to the brain become blocked or burst, thereby cutting off the brain's supply of oxygen. Lack of oxygen causes brain cells to die which can lead to death or disability. Each year, approximately 795,000 people in the U.S. will suffer a new or recurrent stroke. Although people of all ages may have strokes, the risk more than doubles with each decade of life after age 55. The most important modifiable risk factors for stroke are high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes mellitus.</span></div>
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
50.9
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(45.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(45.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
174.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(161.4)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(174.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
NJ 2020
(112.1)
<div>
<div>Heart disease is a term that encompasses a variety of different diseases affecting the heart and is the leading cause of death in the United States accounting for 25.4% of total deaths. The most common type in the United States is coronary artery disease, which can cause heart attack, angina, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Coronary artery disease occurs when plaque builds up in the arteries that supply blood to the heart and the arteries narrow (atherosclerosis). There are many modifiable risk factors for atherosclerosis including tobacco smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and high levels of low-density lipoprotein in blood serum. Moreover, it is important to note that heart disease is the number one killer of women in the United States.</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Hypertensive Heart Disease
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Hypertensive Heart Disease
10.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(9.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
23.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(23.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(22.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Heart Failure: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
70.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(73.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Hypertension: Medicare Population
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Stroke: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
11.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sussex Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Sussex Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
65.3%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(65.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Sussex Babies with Low Birthweight
6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
NJ 2020
(7.7%)
<div><span>Babies born with a low birth weight are more likely than babies of normal weight to require specialized medical care, and often must stay in the intensive care unit. Low birth weight is often associated with premature birth. While there have been many medical advances enabling premature infants to survive, there is still risk of infant death or long-term disability. The most important things an expectant mother can do to prevent prematurity and low birth weight are to take prenatal vitamins, stop smoking, stop drinking alcohol and using drugs, and most importantly, get prenatal care.</span></div>
County: Sussex Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Sussex Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
84.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(74.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(78.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
NJ 2020
(79.4%)
<div><span><span>Babies born to mothers who do not receive prenatal care are three times more likely to have a low birth weight and five times more likely to die than those born to mothers who do get care. Early prenatal care (i.e. care in the first trimester of a pregnancy) allows women and their health care providers to identify and, when possible, treat or correct health problems and health-compromising behaviors that can be particularly damaging during the initial stages of fetal development. Increasing the number of women who receive prenatal care, and who do so early in their pregnancies, can improve birth outcomes and lower health care costs by reducing the likelihood of complications during pregnancy and childbirth.</span></span></div>
County: Sussex Preterm Births
County: Sussex Preterm Births
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(12.0% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Sussex Very Preterm Births
County: Sussex Very Preterm Births
1.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Depression: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Depression: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate
791.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(742.0)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(762.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sussex Life Expectancy
County: Sussex Life Expectancy
78.4
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(79.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sussex
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Disability
28.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
12.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Sussex Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults who were Injured in a Fall: 45+
County: Sussex Adults who were Injured in a Fall: 45+
11.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
28.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(21.8)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(29.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sussex Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults with Arthritis
County: Sussex Adults with Arthritis
23.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Sussex Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
18.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Adults Engaging in Regular Physical Activity
County: Sussex Adults Engaging in Regular Physical Activity
53.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(50.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(29.7%)
<div>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sussex
Health / Prevention & Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
54.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(50.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(60.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings
County: Sussex Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Poisonings
34.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(31.5)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(28.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(39.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
NJ 2020
(6.8)
County: Sussex
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults with Current Asthma
County: Sussex Adults with Current Asthma
12.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(12.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
37.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(24.2)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(36.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sussex Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Sussex Asthma: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex COPD: Medicare Population
County: Sussex COPD: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Chlamydia Cases
County: Sussex Chlamydia Cases
195
Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(191)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Gonorrhea Cases
County: Sussex Gonorrhea Cases
42
Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Syphilis Cases
County: Sussex Syphilis Cases
1
Cases
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Health / Weight Status
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Sussex Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
31.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
NJ 2020
(23.8%)
<div><span>The percentage of obese adults is an indicator of the overall health and lifestyle of a community. Obesity increases the risk of many diseases and health conditions including heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, cancer, hypertension, stroke, liver and gallbladder disease, respiratory problems, and osteoarthritis. Losing weight and maintaining a healthy weight help to prevent and control these diseases. Being obese also carries significant economic costs due to increased healthcare spending and lost earnings.</span></div>
County: Sussex
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Limited Activity due to a Health Problem
County: Sussex Limited Activity due to a Health Problem
13.9%
(2015)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sussex
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Foreign Born Persons
County: Sussex Foreign Born Persons
8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Veteran Population
County: Sussex Veteran Population
5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Sussex Mean Travel Time to Work
36.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(31.1)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Sussex Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Sussex Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Sussex Workers who Drive Alone to Work
78.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(65.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Economy / Housing & Homes
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Overcrowded Households
County: Sussex Overcrowded Households
1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
County: Sussex Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
51.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(50.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Sussex
Economy / Income
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Median Household Income
County: Sussex Median Household Income
$111,094
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
($97,126)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Per Capita Income
County: Sussex Per Capita Income
$54,124
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
($50,995)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Economy / Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Sussex Children Living Below Poverty Level
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: Sussex Families Living Below Poverty Level
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: Sussex People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
County: Sussex People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
1,511
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Sussex People Living Below Poverty Level
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Sussex Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Sussex Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex Youth not in School or Working
County: Sussex Youth not in School or Working
0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Education / Educational Attainment
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Sussex People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
39.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Sussex People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
95.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
NJ Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sussex
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Sussex Access to Parks
County: Sussex Access to Parks
83.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
NJ Counties
The distribution is based on data from 21 New Jersey counties.
NJ Value
(91.4%)
The regional value is compared to the New Jersey State value.
Prior Value
(52.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
